
SEARCH AOCS:


|
  |

HOME >
MEMBERSHIP >
DIVISIONS >
PROCOPRO >
PCP Division Survey Results

2003 PCP Division Survey Results
 |
 |
| 1.
Are you
currently
a member
of the
PCP Division? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
45% |
49 |
|
 |
55% |
60 |
| Total
Respondents |
109 |
| (skipped
this question) |
1 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 2.
If so,
please
indicate
how long
you've
been a
member
of PCP
and AOCS: |
|
|
|
 |
PCP |
AOCS |
Respondent
Total |
| 0-5 |
 |
|
84%
(31) |
49%
(18) |
37 |
| 5-10 |
 |
|
47%
(8) |
82%
(14) |
17 |
| 10+ |
 |
|
43%
(12) |
93%
(26) |
28 |
| Total
Respondents |
66 |
| (skipped
this question) |
44 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 3.
Have you
attended
the AOCS
Annual
Meeting
& Expo
within
the last
two years? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
57.4% |
62 |
|
 |
42.6% |
46 |
| Total
Respondents |
108 |
| (skipped
this question) |
2 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 4.
If you
have not
attended
the AOCS
Annual
Meeting
& Expo
in the
recent
past,
please
explain
why: |
|
|
|
 |
Total
Respondents |
|
40 |
| (skipped
this question) |
70 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 5.
Please
rate your
overall
satisfaction
with the
following
PCP efforts: |
|
|
|
 |
Very
Satisfied |
Satisfied |
Not
Satisfied |
No
Opinion |
Response
Total |
| Annual
Meeting Technical
Sessions |
 |
|
16%
(14) |
46%
(40) |
5%
(4) |
33%
(29) |
87 |
| JAOCS
Papers |
 |
|
17%
(15) |
48%
(43) |
4%
(4) |
30%
(27) |
89 |
| Inform
|
 |
|
24%
(22) |
54%
(49) |
3%
(3) |
19%
(17) |
91 |
| AOCS
Press Publications |
 |
|
10%
(9) |
49%
(43) |
7%
(6) |
34%
(30) |
88 |
| PCP
Newsletter |
 |
|
10%
(9) |
32%
(28) |
6%
(5) |
52%
(45) |
87 |
| PCP
Website |
 |
|
6%
(5) |
15%
(13) |
5%
(4) |
74%
(62) |
84 |
| Networking
Opportunities
(e.g. Division
Roundtable, Dinner,
etc.) |
 |
|
12%
(10) |
24%
(21) |
6%
(5) |
58%
(50) |
86 |
| Total
Respondents |
92 |
| (skipped
this question) |
18 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 6.
Do you
have any
suggestions
that would
make any
of the
above
PCP products
or services
more useful
to you? |
|
|
|
 |
Total
Respondents |
|
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
85 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 7.
The following
topics
have been
suggested
for future
PCP symposium
topics
at the
Annual
Meetings.
Please
rate your
interest
in each
topic
area:
(1 being
most useful,
5 least
useful) |
|
|
|
 |
Most
Useful
1 |
2 |
Somewhat
Useful
3 |
4 |
Least
Useful
5 |
Response
Average |
| Protein
Modifications |
 |
|
39%
(34) |
25%
(22) |
24%
(21) |
8%
(7) |
3%
(3) |
2.11 |
| Industrial
Uses for Proteins |
 |
|
45%
(41) |
24%
(22) |
14%
(13) |
11%
(10) |
5%
(5) |
2.08 |
| Protein
Characterization |
 |
|
27%
(23) |
22%
(19) |
36%
(31) |
11%
(9) |
4%
(3) |
2.41 |
| Protein
Functionality |
 |
|
47%
(43) |
29%
(26) |
16%
(15) |
5%
(5) |
2%
(2) |
1.87 |
| Extrusion
of Protein |
 |
|
20%
(18) |
31%
(28) |
27%
(24) |
16%
(14) |
6%
(5) |
2.55 |
| Separation
Methods |
 |
|
34%
(30) |
32%
(28) |
22%
(19) |
6%
(5) |
7%
(6) |
2.19 |
| Co-Product
Separations |
 |
|
26%
(23) |
32%
(28) |
25%
(22) |
9%
(8) |
8%
(7) |
2.41 |
| Co-Product
Analytical Methods |
 |
|
10%
(9) |
40%
(34) |
29%
(25) |
9%
(8) |
12%
(10) |
2.72 |
| Co-Product
Characterization |
 |
|
14%
(12) |
28%
(24) |
40%
(35) |
10%
(9) |
8%
(7) |
2.71 |
| Co-Product
Applications |
 |
|
31%
(27) |
34%
(29) |
22%
(19) |
8%
(7) |
5%
(4) |
2.21 |
| Product
Development |
 |
|
34%
(30) |
40%
(36) |
13%
(12) |
10%
(9) |
2%
(2) |
2.07 |
| Marketing |
 |
|
18%
(16) |
21%
(19) |
22%
(20) |
25%
(22) |
13%
(12) |
2.94 |
| Funding
Opportunities |
 |
|
21%
(19) |
19%
(17) |
15%
(13) |
18%
(16) |
27%
(24) |
3.10 |
| Total
Respondents |
91 |
| (skipped
this question) |
19 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 8.
Please
specify
any other
suggestions
for topics: |
|
|
|
 |
Total
Respondents |
|
10 |
| (skipped
this question) |
100 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 9.
Currently,
the newsletter
is delivered
by regular
mail and
e-mail.
How would
you prefer
to receive
the newsletter
in the
future? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
9.6% |
9 |
|
 |
38.3% |
36 |
|
 |
19.1% |
18 |
|
|
I
do not receive
the newsletter |
|
 |
33% |
31 |
| Total
Respondents |
94 |
| (skipped
this question) |
16 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 10.
How many
times
do you
visit
the PCP
website
over the
course
of the
year? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
58.9% |
56 |
|
 |
25.3% |
24 |
|
 |
13.7% |
13 |
|
 |
2.1% |
2 |
| Total
Respondents |
95 |
| (skipped
this question) |
15 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 11.
Over the
past couple
of annual
meetings,
the Division
has been
holding
its dinner
jointly
with another
AOCS Division.
At present
we have
been considering
this as
an option
every
second
year.
Should
a joint
Division
event
be held
every: |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
25.6% |
20 |
|
 |
56.4% |
44 |
|
 |
9% |
7 |
|
 |
9% |
7 |
| Total
Respondents |
78 |
| (skipped
this question) |
31 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 12.
Do you
have any
recommendation
for AOCS
Press
book projects? |
|
|
|
 |
Total
Respondents |
|
10 |
| (skipped
this question) |
100 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 13.
The Division
is considering
programming
and sponsoring
technical
sessions
with other
technical
societies
in addition
to the
annual
meeting.
Would
this be
of interest
to you? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
79.1% |
72 |
|
 |
20.9% |
19 |
| Total
Respondents |
91 |
| (skipped
this question) |
19 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 14.
If the
Division
sponsored
one- to
two-day
short
courses
on various
aspects
of protein
structure/function
or related
topics,
would
this be
of interest
to you? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
72.2% |
65 |
|
 |
27.8% |
25 |
| Total
Respondents |
90 |
| (skipped
this question) |
20 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 15.
What is
your primary
job function? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
51.1% |
48 |
|
|
Production
(Plant) Management |
|
 |
3.2% |
3 |
|
 |
1.1% |
1 |
|
|
Business
Owner or Officer |
|
 |
10.6% |
10 |
|
 |
4.3% |
4 |
|
 |
1.1% |
1 |
|
 |
6.4% |
6 |
|
 |
22.3% |
21 |
| Total
Respondents |
94 |
| (skipped
this question) |
16 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 16.
What other
technical
scientific
organizations
do you
participate
in? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
 |
|
ACS |
|
 |
32.5% |
25 |
 |
|
AACC | | | | | |